Cast It Systems
  • Home
  • Clients
  • Talent
  • Services
  • About
  • Contact
Select Page

Movie Review

by Cast It Admin | Nov 12, 2011

Movie review
PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 3

If you need to sleep with the hall light on after seeing this movie, it’s okay. Nobody will judge you. There are more moments of genuine terror in Paranormal Activity 3 than there are in virtually every other horror film in recent memory, including its predecessors.

The film takes place in 1988, 16 years before the first two films take place, with Katie (the star of the first film) and Kristi (the star of the second film) as little girls. Young Kristi (played by the adorable Jessica Tyler Brown) has an imaginary friend (imaginary…right) named Toby. Toby is playful at first, but it is clear that Kristi does not like talking about him to anyone because she might, “Get into trouble”.

Christopher Nicholas Smith does a terrific job playing Kristi and Katie’s likeable stepfather Dennis. Since Dennis is a wedding videographer (a great plot device, since it takes place before everyone and their grandmother owned a video camera), he has all of the video equipment that is needed to make the film play like the first two.

During a botched attempt to film himself having sex with his wife Julie (Lauren Bittner), they are interrupted by an earthquake. This is where the movie really begins, as the dust that falls from the ceiling lands on an invisible presence, creating the shape of a person. Dennis notices this when looking at the footage the next day, and the stage for terror is set.

One of the things that the Paranormal Activity films are so good at doing is setting the characters up as normal, everyday people that you would be friends with. The third installment is no exception. They are funny, engaging, and normal almost to the point that you forget that this is a horror movie. This is why the horror works, because we put ourselves in their shoes. Again, we have obviously already seen this in the first two movies, but that is not to take away from how well it is done in this one.

Much of the credit for how well Paranormal Activity 3 turned out goes to its new directors, Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman. Joost and Schulman, who wrote and directed the 2010 controversial “wait a second, was that real?” documentary Catfish, show that they have what it takes to deliver sustained tension, perfectly-timed comedy, and absolute horror.

One brilliant convention that they use in the film is the use of an oscillating fan. Again, since the movie takes place in 1988, some of today’s video technologies that we take for granted simply did not exist back then. So in the film, Dennis takes apart Julie’s fan, and turns the oscillating function into a panoramic, back-and-forth view from one side of the living room to the opposite end of the kitchen. A few of the shots in these sequences are some of the tensest shots in the film, as the slow panning from one end to the other places us in the environment. One of these shots involving a bed sheet is particularly terrifying.

That is the main difference between this film and so many other horror films these days. Many of them revolve around a dozen or so jump-out-of-your-seat moments, brought about by a loud noise. While there are definitely a few of those in this movie, the real tension comes in the scenes that nothing happens at all. There are scenes that last for five minutes, and that nothing even happens, that will have you at the edge of your seat muttering to yourself that this is only a movie.

One complaint that has been going around is that virtually nothing from any of the trailers actually makes it into the final cut of the film. While this is true (i.e. the now almost iconic “Bloody Mary” scene from the original teaser), does it really matter? The scariest moments in this film simply would not be scary in a two and a half minute trailer. It is almost commendable, actually. There were so many people who watched the first movie and said, “I already knew the ending. It was in all the trailers!” Well, here you go, people. A movie that’s ending, as well as its scariest scenes, are not spoiled before you’ve even seen the movie. And just to whet your appetite, there is a “Bloody Mary” scene in the movie that is actually scarier than the one in the teaser.

So, even though Paranormal Activity 3 is not exactly groundbreaking, as we’ve already seen many of the conventions in the film used in the original and the first sequel (and, to give credit where credit is due, in The Blair Witch Project more than a decade ago), it still delivers. It might be more of the same, but when the same is as scary as this, then you will have nothing to complain about. Nothing, aside from the fact that after seeing it, you might need to replace the batteries in that nightlight you haven’t used since you were eleven.


Movie Review by Mike Danner

 

Casting Networks International Columns

Terry Berland
The Competitive Edge
Laurie Records Commercial Actors Should Never...
Alixandra Kupcik
5 Questions
Angela Peters
His & Hers
Miranda O'Hare
LA Survival Guide
 Alys Daroy
Theatre Angel
 Jill Anenberg-Lawrence
Health Uncensored
Colleen Wainwright
Act Smart! Good Tools for a Great Career
 Bonnie Katz
The Conscious Actor
Karen Ann Pavlick Questions & Actors
Alison McGirr #BreatheMoveReact
Ross Grant Bulletproof Actor
Seminar Recap

Archives

  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • Home
  • Clients
  • Talent
  • Services
  • About
  • Contact
  • Cast It Reach
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
© 2023 Cast It Systems Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information